Bittner, T; Jaeschke, A; Reineking, B; Beierkuhnlein, C: Comparing modelling approaches at two levels of biological organisation – Climate change impacts on selected Natura 2000 habitats, Journal of Vegetation Science, 22(4), 699-710 (2011), doi:10.1111/j.1654-1103.2011.01266.x
Abstract:

Question: Habitats are characterised by their plant species composition. Therefore, climate change impacts on habitats can be assessed by two complementary statistical approaches: Either directly, modelling the climate envelope of the habitat, or indirectly, by modelling the habitat in terms of its plant species. How do these approaches differ in their projected habitat distribution? What are consequences for nature conservation?
Location: Europe
Methods: Potential climate change impacts on the distribution of European protected Natura 2000 sites were modelled for five natural and semi-natural grassland habitat types, defined by the EU Habitats Directive, using data from the Atlas Florae Europaeae and reports on Natura 2000 sites. We used random forests (RF) and logistic regression (GLM) to model the current and potential future distribution for 2050.
Results: All habitats are projected to lose between 22% and 93% of their range in the ‘no dispersal’ scenario. In the ‘unrestricted dispersal’ scenario, almost all habitats gain suitable climate space, between 5% and 100% of their current range.
In the direct habitat approach, both model algorithms have high discriminatory performance on test data and are well calibrated. In the indirect species approach, only GLM shows high model performance; RF models are overfitted.
Projections of occurrence probabilities differ more strongly between model approaches (‘direct’ vs. ‘indirect’) than between model algorithms (GLM vs. RF).
Conclusions: Habitats are complex entities. Because of their dynamic nature, particularly in the face of climate change, we suggest to model the future distribution of habitat types not exclusively based on their current definitions and mapped distributions, but also based on their constituent elements, and in particular their characteristic plant species.

Upcoming ...

Fr. 2020-07-10 now
12th BayCEER Workshop 2020: "Call for Abstracts" is open
BayCEER Colloquium:
Th. 2020-10-29
Dissolved organic matter quality in differently managed forest ecosystems
Th. 2020-11-05
Signaling of rhizosphere microbiome: key for plant health, development and nutrition
Th. 2020-11-12
Environmental monitoring in Afghanistan’s national parks – regional challenges and global implications
Workshop:
Th. 2020-10-29
BayCEER Workshop 2020
BayCEER Blog
13.01.2020
Why Science Communication?
24.05.2019
Stoichiometric controls of C and N cycling
07.05.2019
Flying halfway across the globe to dig in the dirt – a research stay in Bloomington, USA
16.04.2019
Picky carnivorous plants?
RSS Blog as RSS Feed
Weather research site
Luftdruck (356m): 968.8 hPa
Lufttemperatur: 29.1 °C
Niederschlag: 0.0 mm/24h
Sonnenschein: <1 h/d
Wind (Höhe 17m): 6.7 km/h
Wind (Max.): 16.2 km/h
Windrichtung: SO

...more
Globalstrahlung: 672 W/m²
Lufttemperatur: 26.3 °C
Niederschlag: 0.0 mm/24h
Sonnenschein: 4 h/d
Wind (Höhe 32m): 0.0 km/h

...more
This site makes use of cookies More information